Here, the coach uses a formal or informal method of identifying client strengths. Once identified, the coaching conversation involves a discussion of how to apply a particular strength to a problem at hand or using a strength in a novel way.
Main Themes:
Advantages: Feels good to the client bc it discusses a positive aspect of the client; May identify a resource the client has overlooked
Criticism: Too often relies on formal assessment and misses many client strengths; a myopic focus on “top 5”; There is no ready justification for why a “new way” is superior to “the current way;” and– most importantly– too often focuses on the problem at hand rather than the development of the strength as a whole– that is, building the client’s capacity to solve ALL problems.
Examples of Level 1 Coaching Questions:
Here, the coach identifies the strengths but then spends extra time exploring the degree to which the strengths fit, how they manifest, etc. Thereafter, the conversation turns to aiming the strengths. This might include using the strength (at all), using it more, or using it in tandem with other strengths.
Main Themes:
Advantages: Relies somewhat less on “coach expertise” and gives the client a great seat at the table; has a greater appreciation of individual differences in the ways that people react to strengths language; Has relatively more options for “aiming” strengths
Criticism: Takes longer because of the “claim” conversation; Can inadvertently create the expectation of success (“Hey! You’re using your strengths! It’ll probably work because they are strengths!)
Examples of Level 2 Coaching Questions:
The coach and client identify strengths, as above. There is a heavy assumption that strengths are highly contextual. This means that 1)each strength might show up differently for each person, 2)that they might use the strength differently in various situations, or that 3) it might be wise to use the strength less or not at all. The focus is on developing a practical understanding of strengths– their nature and optimal deployment across problems and situations.
Main Themes:
Advantages: Treats strengths use as an experiment with no expectations of success; Heavy focus on situational appropriateness of strengths (especially by looking at the social impact of strengths); positions strengths as qualities to be developed rather than traits to be relied upon.
Criticism: Can be time-consuming; Can replace client’s more urgent goals with a less-urgent focus on capacity building; Can be complicated and therefore requires a high level of coaching skill and psychological mindedness.
Examples of Level 3 Coaching Questions: